<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too many solicitation letters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/</link>
	<description>Reduce the number of catalogs you receive in the mail and go paperless.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:23:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne Camesi</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/comment-page-1/#comment-10330</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne Camesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1078#comment-10330</guid>
		<description>Correction! That our name NOT be given out to other charities. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction! That our name NOT be given out to other charities. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne Camesi</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/comment-page-1/#comment-10329</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne Camesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1078#comment-10329</guid>
		<description>Barbara, that&#039;s what I did and it&#039;s worked.  My standard letter indicates that we have certain charities we donate and do not have the funds to accomadate any additional charities.  Mine are the Native American schools.  I&#039;ve even contacted them and requested that my or my husband&#039;s mail info be given out. It&#039;s been honored.  Recently, I had a phone call from a public television foundation thanking me for our support.  I politely explained that four letters were sent requesting removal.  The caller was very apologetic and so was I because I understand the hard work that a fundraiser  does.  
CC.org: my catalog receipts are almost nil..Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara, that&#8217;s what I did and it&#8217;s worked.  My standard letter indicates that we have certain charities we donate and do not have the funds to accomadate any additional charities.  Mine are the Native American schools.  I&#8217;ve even contacted them and requested that my or my husband&#8217;s mail info be given out. It&#8217;s been honored.  Recently, I had a phone call from a public television foundation thanking me for our support.  I politely explained that four letters were sent requesting removal.  The caller was very apologetic and so was I because I understand the hard work that a fundraiser  does.<br />
CC.org: my catalog receipts are almost nil..Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/comment-page-1/#comment-10276</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1078#comment-10276</guid>
		<description>as a professional fundraiser I can tell you that any nonprofit worth its salt (and your donation) should be able to send you LESS postal appeal letters at your request.  It&#039;s a simple database code.  Most can also code you electronic only etc. You will have to contact the organization and if they can&#039;t accomodate this you might reconsider whether you want to continue your support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a professional fundraiser I can tell you that any nonprofit worth its salt (and your donation) should be able to send you LESS postal appeal letters at your request.  It&#8217;s a simple database code.  Most can also code you electronic only etc. You will have to contact the organization and if they can&#8217;t accomodate this you might reconsider whether you want to continue your support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Zelenko</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/06/05/too-many-solicitation-letters/comment-page-1/#comment-10267</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Zelenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1078#comment-10267</guid>
		<description>Will be great if Catalog Choice will enter charities territory in same way as it successfully entered catalogs one.

I don&#039;t think that unwanted charity is better in any respect then unwanted catalog. And it waste money donated by other donors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be great if Catalog Choice will enter charities territory in same way as it successfully entered catalogs one.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that unwanted charity is better in any respect then unwanted catalog. And it waste money donated by other donors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
