<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How we line up with the Abacus questions on mail preference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/05/11/how-we-line-up-with-the-abacus-questions-on-mail-preference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/05/11/how-we-line-up-with-the-abacus-questions-on-mail-preference/</link>
	<description>Reduce the number of catalogs you receive in the mail and go paperless.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:23:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/05/11/how-we-line-up-with-the-abacus-questions-on-mail-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-10171</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1006#comment-10171</guid>
		<description>HI Tracy:

Thanks for the support!  Through thick and thin, we knew that we could make sense out of this complex process.  It is a win-win-win - consumers, companies and the environment!

Best, Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Tracy:</p>
<p>Thanks for the support!  Through thick and thin, we knew that we could make sense out of this complex process.  It is a win-win-win &#8211; consumers, companies and the environment!</p>
<p>Best, Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Glomski</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2009/05/11/how-we-line-up-with-the-abacus-questions-on-mail-preference/comment-page-1/#comment-10170</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Glomski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=1006#comment-10170</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how anyone could object to those answers. I continue to feel very good about Catalog Choice. I&#039;ve consistently received fewer than one catalog per week for a number of months now. My records show that I&#039;ve contacted only ten companies personally since joining Catalog Choice in 2007. Dozens of other opt-out requests have been honored much more efficiently through my Catalog Choice account.

I didn&#039;t know whether to laugh or cry when I read this part of Abacus&#039; publication: &quot;In addition to these steps, we also recommend that you run your suppression file at your service bureau during the merge process.&quot; That seems like such an obvious good practice, but I guess it&#039;s not standard. I&#039;m pretty sure that the company that I PSform1500&#039;ed was omitting that little detail from their process, since they couldn&#039;t seem to suppress their mailings to me despite repeated requests.

But overall, it&#039;s clear that phenomenal progress has been made toward addressing a very complex issue. It&#039;s wonderful to see so many people working together on meaningful, win-win solutions. I am grateful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how anyone could object to those answers. I continue to feel very good about Catalog Choice. I&#8217;ve consistently received fewer than one catalog per week for a number of months now. My records show that I&#8217;ve contacted only ten companies personally since joining Catalog Choice in 2007. Dozens of other opt-out requests have been honored much more efficiently through my Catalog Choice account.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know whether to laugh or cry when I read this part of Abacus&#8217; publication: &#8220;In addition to these steps, we also recommend that you run your suppression file at your service bureau during the merge process.&#8221; That seems like such an obvious good practice, but I guess it&#8217;s not standard. I&#8217;m pretty sure that the company that I PSform1500&#8242;ed was omitting that little detail from their process, since they couldn&#8217;t seem to suppress their mailings to me despite repeated requests.</p>
<p>But overall, it&#8217;s clear that phenomenal progress has been made toward addressing a very complex issue. It&#8217;s wonderful to see so many people working together on meaningful, win-win solutions. I am grateful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
