<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listening to what customers want and need</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/</link>
	<description>Reduce the number of catalogs you receive in the mail and go paperless.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>Yvonne &#38; Christen:  As for Victoria's Secret, their website offers an option to decrease mailings.  I tried, and have seen a definite decrease.  After getting 2 or 3 catalogs per week, I am down to one per season.  If that option interests you, try it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yvonne &amp; Christen:  As for Victoria&#8217;s Secret, their website offers an option to decrease mailings.  I tried, and have seen a definite decrease.  After getting 2 or 3 catalogs per week, I am down to one per season.  If that option interests you, try it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Caesar</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8930</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Caesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8930</guid>
		<description>I feel as others have written; I'm beginning to wonder if Catalogue Choice is enough.  I called Sturbridge Yankee Workshop after getting 3 catalogues with three different customer numbers.  The rep was able to tell me that they got my name from a large mailing list from a third party vendor.  I think it is time to work for a "do not mail" list similar to a "do not call list" as another blogger suggested.  It is just as invasive to find these catalogues in your mailbox as it is(was) to receive phone calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel as others have written; I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if Catalogue Choice is enough.  I called Sturbridge Yankee Workshop after getting 3 catalogues with three different customer numbers.  The rep was able to tell me that they got my name from a large mailing list from a third party vendor.  I think it is time to work for a &#8220;do not mail&#8221; list similar to a &#8220;do not call list&#8221; as another blogger suggested.  It is just as invasive to find these catalogues in your mailbox as it is(was) to receive phone calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenna Daniels</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8914</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenna Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8914</guid>
		<description>FEDERALLY REQUIRED AFFILIATE MARKETING NOTICE

Received a notice today from a bank that I do business with.

It listed their affiliates along with an 800 # to opt out of marketing from their affiliates (they listed 25 separate affiliates)

BIG QUESTION here for Catalog Choice.

DOES THE FEDERAL AFFILIATE MARKETING LAW EXTEND TO OTHER BUSINESSES, SPECIFICALLY DIRECT MARKETING (CATALOG) COMPANIES ?

NOTE: When you opt out of marketing by your bank's affiliates, it is in effect for 
5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEDERALLY REQUIRED AFFILIATE MARKETING NOTICE</p>
<p>Received a notice today from a bank that I do business with.</p>
<p>It listed their affiliates along with an 800 # to opt out of marketing from their affiliates (they listed 25 separate affiliates)</p>
<p>BIG QUESTION here for Catalog Choice.</p>
<p>DOES THE FEDERAL AFFILIATE MARKETING LAW EXTEND TO OTHER BUSINESSES, SPECIFICALLY DIRECT MARKETING (CATALOG) COMPANIES ?</p>
<p>NOTE: When you opt out of marketing by your bank&#8217;s affiliates, it is in effect for<br />
5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8910</guid>
		<description>Eddie Bauer is one of the worst.  For a company with an "environmental" philosophy - it is shameful.  I have about 6 different customer numbers from them.  Every time I decline one catalog, they just issue another one with a new customer number.  I will NOT shop with them ever again.  When will retailers learn that honoring our requests is a crucial part of what we expect in customer service!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie Bauer is one of the worst.  For a company with an &#8220;environmental&#8221; philosophy - it is shameful.  I have about 6 different customer numbers from them.  Every time I decline one catalog, they just issue another one with a new customer number.  I will NOT shop with them ever again.  When will retailers learn that honoring our requests is a crucial part of what we expect in customer service!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenna Daniels</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8906</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenna Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8906</guid>
		<description>Send the catalog compainies (sic) a direct e-mail opting out and mention that this is "A PRIVACY ACT REQUEST" This gets an immediate response.

Also say to opt of of any and all derivations of your name &#38; address and any and all customer numbers. 

This has worked in every instance. 

Good Luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send the catalog compainies (sic) a direct e-mail opting out and mention that this is &#8220;A PRIVACY ACT REQUEST&#8221; This gets an immediate response.</p>
<p>Also say to opt of of any and all derivations of your name &amp; address and any and all customer numbers. </p>
<p>This has worked in every instance. </p>
<p>Good Luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne Camesi</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8902</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne Camesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8902</guid>
		<description>JJ: Thanks for your info, I may be running for cover from CC.org, now, but they are the nice people. When I said radical, the last time I went to forestethics.org, their info had not changed.  I don't have all the hi tech video computer stuff that many have - I just have some experience with logistics of unwanted catalogs and junk mailings, and venturing about is limited. I thoroughly agree, with CC.org, Change is coming! They really have ampliified the consumer's voice about excessive catalog mailings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ: Thanks for your info, I may be running for cover from CC.org, now, but they are the nice people. When I said radical, the last time I went to forestethics.org, their info had not changed.  I don&#8217;t have all the hi tech video computer stuff that many have - I just have some experience with logistics of unwanted catalogs and junk mailings, and venturing about is limited. I thoroughly agree, with CC.org, Change is coming! They really have ampliified the consumer&#8217;s voice about excessive catalog mailings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tara</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8900</link>
		<dc:creator>tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8900</guid>
		<description>Help... I am getting more magazines. This is not working for me. Does anyone have any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help&#8230; I am getting more magazines. This is not working for me. Does anyone have any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8898</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8898</guid>
		<description>Another benefit: no more shredding the address area and order forms to prevent identity theft!  Thanks for making this service available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another benefit: no more shredding the address area and order forms to prevent identity theft!  Thanks for making this service available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8897</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8897</guid>
		<description>Kristen:
We are doing everything possible to get the merchants to honor your requests.  There is no legal obligation.  We are talking to the merchants every day and developing new features that we think will make it more likely for them to honor our requests.  Hang in there.  Change is coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristen:<br />
We are doing everything possible to get the merchants to honor your requests.  There is no legal obligation.  We are talking to the merchants every day and developing new features that we think will make it more likely for them to honor our requests.  Hang in there.  Change is coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.catalogchoice.org/2008/08/19/listening-to-what-customers-want-and-need/#comment-8893</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catalogchoice.org/?p=222#comment-8893</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify part of Yvonne's prior comment, Forest Ethics' beef with Victoria's Secret was primarily about using unsustainable wood from endangered forests.  If you go to their website for that particular campaign  (http://www.victoriasdirtysecret.net/), you'll see that Victoria's Secret changed their paper procurement policies and Forest Ethcis subsequently backed off.  They're going after Sears now (primarily), but again, it's more about the origin of the wood than honoring customer opt-outs.

Keep up the good work, CC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify part of Yvonne&#8217;s prior comment, Forest Ethics&#8217; beef with Victoria&#8217;s Secret was primarily about using unsustainable wood from endangered forests.  If you go to their website for that particular campaign  (http://www.victoriasdirtysecret.net/), you&#8217;ll see that Victoria&#8217;s Secret changed their paper procurement policies and Forest Ethcis subsequently backed off.  They&#8217;re going after Sears now (primarily), but again, it&#8217;s more about the origin of the wood than honoring customer opt-outs.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, CC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
