« Back to blog home page

The call for the Catalog Extreme Makeover

Kevin over at MineThatData blog has an insightful post for catalog merchants.  Here are Kevin’s recommendations to an extreme makeover for the catalog industry. I hope all the merchants are reading his blog.

Here are nine ways for us to begin to repair our reputation, and be good stewards.

  • It is time for the DMA to do something with the $10,000 to $50,000 each of our organizations pay them each year. And that something is not telling us to “just say no” to Catalog Choice. If one of our customers or one of our prospects doesn’t want to receive a catalog, we have to honor that request. Honor the customer, and challenge the DMA for modern solutions and real action.
  • Have you considered joining the American Catalog Mailers Association? It won’t cost you the $10,000 to $50,000 it costs to join the DMA. While this organization believes that the response of the press to the folks at Catalog Choice “give them the willies“, I perceive this organization wants to “do what is right”. Best of all, you could play an active role in doing “what is right”.
  • Make it easy for your own customers to opt-out of catalogs. You make it easy for customers to opt-out of e-mail campaigns, don’t you? The reality of the marketplace is that you have to do this for catalog mailings as well. Times have changed.
  • Strongly consider the mailing strategy you employ for online-only customers. These customers may consider you as an online brand, not as a cataloger, hence their dissatisfaction of your online mailing strategy.
  • Give customers a say … give them an option to receive half of your mailings, and brand this choice as being “eco-friendly”. Test the living daylights out of this ahead of time, so you know the ramifications this will have on your business.
  • Oversight … do a “deep dive” with the co-ops. If you allow co-ops to mail a quarter of all your catalogs, you have given a quarter of your brand authority to co-ops. Wow. Do you oversee the vendors you work with in China to ensure that the working conditions are acceptable? If you do, don’t you think you should provide the same oversight with co-ops? And if co-ops won’t provide transparency, well, then, you need to think about your relationship with them, don’t you? The folks who work at co-ops are good people, they will respond to a catalog industry that demands oversight.
  • Would a little “PR” hurt? Catalog Choice gets picked up by major publications all over America, quoting the billions of trees catalogers harvest each year. As a result of our inactivity, Catalog Choice muscled in, and now has a seat at our Executive Table, managing our brands for us. Why can’t catalogers go on the offensive? How much would it cost for a catalog to plant “x” trees each year? And how much good will would be done by having the press, bloggers, and TV stations all reporting the fact that two hundred employees spent a random Wednesday in July planting trees? Why aren’t we good stewards? Why don’t we “toot our own horn” when we do good? Why don’t we tell our customers that we’re planting four trees for every tree we cut down? And if we don’t plant four trees for every tree we cut down, why don’t we start doing this?
  • Speaking of PR, why not tell the world that over the past five years, we spent “x” dollars less on catalog mailings, moving that money into online marketing that theoretically reduces our carbon footprint?
  • Launch new initiatives online. Test various new products and brands online, and via e-mail. Use online marketing to test the initiatives before rolling out new products and brands via paper. And then tell the world how many trees you saved by doing this.

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 27th, 2007 at 4:01 pm and is filed under Merchants. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “The call for the Catalog Extreme Makeover”

  1. Get kids involved! You could post a “kids, teachers, schools” area on our site, where kids and teachers could get more information about Catalog Choice and how to get schools involved. How about a catalog challenge? Kids could compete to see which students families could decline the most number of catalogs? Kids could plant the same number of saplings at an area park or blighted area as the number of trees saved by declining those catalogs?

    Kids, as any parent can tell you, are some of the most vigilant, persistent advocates for the environment. And since many kids faithfully recycle, Catalog Choice would be something they could easily understand and embrace.

    Anne Lindenfeld on December 30th, 2007 at 7:44 am
  2. And get those bloggers involved!

    I have your click-through button on my blog, and I am sure others would do to same, if they knew about Catalog Choice. If Blogger, Technoratic, Yahoo, etc. put a notice on their front pages for a day, you would certainly get plenty of free advertising.

    Anne Lindenfeld on December 30th, 2007 at 7:46 am
  3. I’m glad people like Kevin are at least trying to get involved to resolve my overstuffed mailbox (in 2007 alone, I have received approx. 2.4 tons of unwanted catalog-yes, I actually get them weighed!). Rather than an op-out program, how about an opt-in program? a lot of retailers ask for name/address when you make major purchases and they automatically opt you in. You are NOT required to provide any information of that nature to them in order to make purchases.

    I am using Catalog Choice as the only avenue open to me to resolve the burgeoning catalog distribution problem. I have tried communicating directly with the merchants (and yes, they could care less for the most part), I have done the “Return to Sender” much to the post office’s dismay..soooooo, if Catalog Choice works and the merchants won’t then that’s what I’m using and recommending to my friends.

    Bill Davis on December 30th, 2007 at 11:16 am
  4. I like Bill’s opt-in idea. That would greatly reduce the 19-20 billion catalogs per year figure. Do you know how many mailed catalogs are triggered by a phone or web opt in?

    Dan Rotkopf on January 1st, 2008 at 9:29 pm
  5. Another ecofriendly option for catalog companies - offer a “holiday season only” option. I would welcome recieving one catalog from many of these retailers during the holidays, since that is the only time I look at them anyway!

    Lisa Guide on January 10th, 2008 at 11:37 am
  6. Bill - did you really get 2.4 TONS of catalogs in 2007? How many catalogs is that? I don’t really understand how an opt-in program would work to stop catalogs; and given our current system (which most users of this site are already “opted in” to); we designed Catalog Choice as a way to get off of catalog mailing lists.

    We understand that many users wish to receive less catalogs (as opposed to no catalogs), and are keeping this in mind as a feature to develop in the future.

    paul@catalogchoice.org on January 15th, 2008 at 11:05 am
  7. I second the idea of a “holiday only” and/or “eco-friendly” option of getting half (or, better yet, quarterly) mailings. There are a few catalogs that I don’t mind getting, but it is infuriating to get more than one per month and sometimes more than one per week at holiday time.

    Carrie on January 16th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
  8. 2.4 tons of catalogs=4800 pounds
    divide that by 312 (52 weeks/year, 6 days of mail per day=312) that totals:

    15.4 pounds of catalogs per day.

    I just grabbed 10 random catalogs and weighed them. The total weight was under 2.9 pounds. At this rate it means you’re getting around 50+ catalogs per day (or some unbelievably heavy ones).

    Time to buy a new scale…

    anonymous on January 16th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
  9. A simple solution to reducing catalogs is for the US Postal Service to charge the people who mail catalogs the same as they charge us. Not only do we get the “junk mail” but we are subsidising it!

    Fred on January 17th, 2008 at 7:42 am
  10. Actually, Fred… it would be more accurate to say that commercial mail subsidizes private party first class mail. Just consider what it costs to stop by every suburban residence in the USA six times a week. There’s no way private mail could do enough volume to make that work for an occasional $0.41. If you mean government/taxpayer subsidy, that stopped a couple of decades ago.

    Dave Brown on January 19th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
 

(required)

(required) Will not be published